Information security policies are often treated as paperwork. Something you write once, approve, file away, and dust off when an audit appears in the calendar.Annex A 5.1 exists to stop that happening.
This control is about setting clear direction for how information security is managed across the organisation. Not in technical detail. Not as procedures. But as principles that guide consistent, risk-based decisions.
When policies are done well, they simplify security. When they’re done badly, they become shelfware.
Annex A 5.1 is a foundational governance control. It sets the tone for the entire Information Security Management System (ISMS).
Policies define:
Without clear policies, security becomes inconsistent. Teams improvise. Decisions vary depending on who’s involved. Risk acceptance becomes informal and undocumented.
From a security perspective, that inconsistency is often where incidents start.
From a business perspective, unclear policies lead to friction — security teams blocking work, delivery teams bypassing controls, and leadership stepping in only when something breaks.
A well-designed policy framework:
A common real-world scenario we see is organisations with technically strong controls but weak policy direction. When an exception arises — a supplier request, a new platform, a rushed delivery — there’s no agreed framework to guide the decision. That’s when risk is introduced quietly and unintentionally.
A practical, security-first approach usually includes the following steps.
Policies exist to set direction, not to document every control.
Start by being clear about what your policies are there to achieve:
This clarity helps avoid over-engineering and keeps policies focused on outcomes.
Policies work best when they reflect how the organisation actually operates.
This includes considering:
A small software company and a regulated financial organisation will legitimately take different approaches — and Annex A 5.1 allows for that.
Management approval is not a formality. It signals ownership.
When leadership approves policies:
Approval should be explicit and recorded, but it does not need to be complex.
If policies are hard to find or hard to read, they won’t influence behaviour.
Effective policies are:
Many organisations now separate policy from procedure, keeping policies concise and using supporting documentation where detail is needed.
Annex A 5.1 expects policies to remain appropriate as things change.
Triggers for review often include:
Review should focus on relevance, not just timestamps.
These issues are rarely technical problems — they’re governance and clarity problems.
Annex A 5.1 is not about having “a policy”. It’s about having useful policy direction that supports secure, consistent decision-making.
When implemented well:
If policies feel heavy, ignored, or outdated, that’s usually a sign they’ve drifted away from their original purpose.
Get the direction right, keep it relevant, and let the rest of the ISMS build on that foundation.
We can help you understand your actual security needs and even if we cant help we can point you in the right direction
Talk to a security expert today
