Outsourcing development does not outsource risk.
If security expectations are unclear, vulnerabilities are designed in by someone else — and owned by you.
Annex A 8.30 exists to ensure organisations maintain effective information security controls when system or software development is outsourced, reducing the risk of compromise, loss of control, or misalignment with organisational security requirements.
This control is about governance and assurance, not blocking outsourcing.

Annex A 8.30 of ISO 27001:2022 focuses on security requirements for outsourced development.
At a practical level, this means:
The control does not prohibit outsourcing. It expects organisations to retain control over security outcomes, even when development is performed externally.
Outsourced development introduces specific risks, including:
If unmanaged, these risks can result in:
Annex A 8.30 ensures organisations do not lose control of information security simply because development is performed by a third party.
This control replaces ISO 27001:2013 Annex A 14.2.7, with no reduction in intent and stronger alignment to modern supply-chain risk.
A pragmatic approach to Annex A 8.30 typically includes the following elements.
Organisations should clearly define:
Requirements should align with:
Undefined requirements lead to unverifiable outcomes.
Contracts and agreements should address:
Security expectations that are not contractual are optional in practice.
Organisations should explicitly define:
Ambiguity around ownership creates both security and legal risk.
Outsourced development environments should meet defined security requirements, including:
Development environments are high-value targets.
Where risk justifies it, organisations should:
Security design decisions made externally still affect internal risk.
Annex A 8.30 explicitly supports assurance.
Organisations should require evidence such as:
Assertions without evidence are not assurance.
Before accepting delivered systems, organisations should:
Acceptance should be based on evidence, not trust.
Contracts should allow organisations to:
Audit rights support accountability and continuous improvement.
Organisations should ensure:
Source code exposure increases both security and competitive risk.
Annex A 8.30 supports planning for:
Controls such as source code escrow may be appropriate for critical systems.
This control aligns closely with:
Outsourced development should be governed as part of the wider supply-chain security model.
Annex A 8.30 does not require:
It does require organisations to:
Most outsourced development failures stem from poor governance, not malicious suppliers.
Outsourcing reduces effort — not responsibility.
Annex A 8.30 is about keeping security under organisational control, even when development is external.
When outsourced development is governed effectively:
You can outsource development.
You cannot outsource accountability.
Annex A 8.30 ensures organisations never forget that.
We can help you understand your actual security needs and even if we cant help we can point you in the right direction
Talk to a security expert today